Skip to main content

Protocol Scorecard

About the Scoring

Our in-depth evaluation analyzed 20* forest carbon credit protocols used in North American voluntary and compliance carbon markets.
We assessed 18 distinct protocol features to produce detailed scores for three types of forest projects: Avoided Conversation, Improved Forest Management, and Reforestation.

Score Summary

Score Summary
Score Protocol Results
6 Exemplary
0 (0%)
5 Very Robust
0 (0%)
4 Robust
0 (0%)
3 Satisfactory
1 (3.3%)
2 Weak
26 (86.7%)
1 Very Weak
3 (10%)
0 Fund. Flawed
0 (0%)
30 Total

Protocol Scores

View on desktop to see detailed scoring information for each protocol.

Protocol Scores
ID
Protocol Name
Program Project Type Overall Score
1 VM0045 IFM Using Dynamic Matched Baselines from National Forest Inventories, V1.0** Verra IFM
3.2
Satisfactory
Scoring breakdown for VM0045 IFM Using Dynamic Matched Baselines from National Forest Inventories, V1.0**
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Robust 4.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Satisfactory 3.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
2 VM0035 IFM through Reduced Impact Logging, V1.0 Verra IFM
2.7
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0035 IFM through Reduced Impact Logging, V1.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Weak 2.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
3 VM0005 Conversion of Low-Productive Forest to High-Productive Forest, V1.2 Verra IFM
2.5
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0005 Conversion of Low-Productive Forest to High-Productive Forest, V1.2
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Very Weak 1.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
4 VM0012 IFM in Temperate and Boreal Forests (LtPF), V1.2 Verra IFM
2.5
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0012 IFM in Temperate and Boreal Forests (LtPF), V1.2
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
5 VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0 Verra IFM
2.5
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
6 VM0010 IFM: Conversion from Logged to Protected Forest, V1.3** Verra IFM
2.4
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0010 IFM: Conversion from Logged to Protected Forest, V1.3**
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Very Weak 1.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
7 VM0003 IFM through Extension of Rotation Age, V1.3 Verra IFM
2.4
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0003 IFM through Extension of Rotation Age, V1.3
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Very Weak 1.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
8 U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1 Climate Action Reserve IFM
2.3
Weak
Scoring breakdown for U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.5
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Satisfactory 3.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
9 IFM on Non-Federal U.S. Forestlands, V2.0** American Carbon Registry IFM
2.3
Weak
Scoring breakdown for IFM on Non-Federal U.S. Forestlands, V2.0**
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
10 IFM on Small Non-Industrial Private Forestlands, V1.0** American Carbon Registry IFM
2.2
Weak
Scoring breakdown for IFM on Small Non-Industrial Private Forestlands, V1.0**
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
11 U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015 California IFM
2.2
Weak
Scoring breakdown for U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Fund. Flawed 0.5
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is leakage accounted for?
Very Weak 1.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Very Weak 1.5
12 IFM on Canadian Forestlands, V1.0 American Carbon Registry IFM
2.2
Weak
Scoring breakdown for IFM on Canadian Forestlands, V1.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
13 Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2.0 British Columbia IFM
2.1
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Satisfactory 3.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Fund. Flawed 0.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Very Weak 1.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Very Weak 1.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
14 Mexico Forest Protocol, V3.0 Climate Action Reserve IFM
1.9
Very Weak
Scoring breakdown for Mexico Forest Protocol, V3.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Weak 2.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Satisfactory 3.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
15 PM 001 Agriculture and Forestry Carbon Benefit Assessment Methodology, V1.0 Plan Vivo IFM
1.4
Very Weak
Scoring breakdown for PM 001 Agriculture and Forestry Carbon Benefit Assessment Methodology, V1.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Weak 1.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Very Weak 1.5
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Fund. Flawed 0.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Very Weak 1.0
16 U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1 Climate Action Reserve AR
2.7
Weak
Scoring breakdown for U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.5
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Satisfactory 3.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
17 Afforestation and Reforestation of Degraded Lands American Carbon Registry AR
2.7
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Afforestation and Reforestation of Degraded Lands
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Very Weak 1.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
18 U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015 California AR
2.7
Weak
Scoring breakdown for U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Fund. Flawed 0.5
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
19 VM0047 Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation, V1.0 Verra AR
2.7
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0047 Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation, V1.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Robust 4.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.5
20 Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2 British Columbia AR
2.4
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Satisfactory 3.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Fund. Flawed 0.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Very Weak 1.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Very Weak 1.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.5
21 VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0 Verra AR
2.3
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.5
22 Mexico Forest Protocol, V3.0 Climate Action Reserve AR
2.3
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Mexico Forest Protocol, V3.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Weak 2.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Satisfactory 3.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.5
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Satisfactory 3.0
23 Afforestation/Reforestation (A/R) GHGs Emissions Reduction & Sequestration, V2.0** Gold Standard AR
2.1
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Afforestation/Reforestation (A/R) GHGs Emissions Reduction & Sequestration, V2.0**
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Very Weak 1.5
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Fund. Flawed 0.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
24 Carbon Sequestration Through AR on Private Lands – September 2023 Quebec AR
2.0
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Carbon Sequestration Through AR on Private Lands – September 2023
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Weak 1.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Very Weak 1.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Fund. Flawed 0.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Very Weak 1.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.5
25 PM 001 Agriculture and Forestry Carbon Benefit Assessment Methodology, V1.0 Plan Vivo AR
1.8
Very Weak
Scoring breakdown for PM 001 Agriculture and Forestry Carbon Benefit Assessment Methodology, V1.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Weak 1.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Very Weak 1.5
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Fund. Flawed 0.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.5
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Weak 2.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.5
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
26 Active Conservation and Sustainable Management on U.S. Forestlands, V1.0 American Carbon Registry AC
2.2
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Active Conservation and Sustainable Management on U.S. Forestlands, V1.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.5
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Very Weak 1.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Satisfactory 3.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Robust 4.0
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
27 Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2.0 British Columbia AC
2.2
Weak
Scoring breakdown for Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Satisfactory 3.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Fund. Flawed 0.0
Non-permanence risk reduction What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Very Weak 1.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Very Weak 1.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Very Weak 1.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
28 VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0 Verra AC
2.2
Weak
Scoring breakdown for VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Satisfactory 3.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Weak 2.0
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Weak 2.0
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Weak 2.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Weak 2.0
29 U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1 Climate Action Reserve AC
2.1
Weak
Scoring breakdown for U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.5
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Satisfactory 3.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Very Weak 1.0
30 U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015 California AC
2.0
Weak
Scoring breakdown for U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015
Component Feature Score
Non-permanence risk reduction How long is project carbon monitored for reversal?
Very Robust 5.5
How is approach to account for risk of reversal structured?
Weak 2.0
What is the approach to determining buffer pool contribution?
Weak 2.0
How is risk of fire accounted for the buffer pool?
Very Weak 1.0
How is risk of insect and disease outbreak accounted for the buffer pool?
Fund. Flawed 0.5
How frequently is risk assessment revisited?
Weak 2.0
Additionality and baseline establishment What are the requirements for demonstrating additionality?
Weak 2.0
How is the baseline scenario established?
Very Weak 1.0
How is the baseline scenario forecasted over time?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the requirements for reassessing the baseline over time?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into the baseline scenario?
Weak 2.0
Quantification and monitoring requirements How is carbon stored in tree biomass estimated?
Satisfactory 3.5
What is the required sampling frequency?
Weak 2.5
How is carbon stored in harvested wood products estimated?
Satisfactory 3.0
How is soil carbon storage handled?
Satisfactory 3.0
What are the data sources required for monitoring and credit issuance?
Weak 2.0
What are the requirements for incorporating uncertainty into project quantification?
Satisfactory 3.0
Leakage accounting How is leakage accounted for?
Very Weak 1.0

  • Protocol 1

    VM0045 IFM Using Dynamic Matched Baselines from National Forest Inventories, V1.0**

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    3.2
    Satisfactory

  • Protocol 2

    VM0035 IFM through Reduced Impact Logging, V1.0

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.7
    Weak

  • Protocol 3

    VM0005 Conversion of Low-Productive Forest to High-Productive Forest, V1.2

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.5
    Weak

  • Protocol 4

    VM0012 IFM in Temperate and Boreal Forests (LtPF), V1.2

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.5
    Weak

  • Protocol 5

    VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.5
    Weak

  • Protocol 6

    VM0010 IFM: Conversion from Logged to Protected Forest, V1.3**

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.4
    Weak

  • Protocol 7

    VM0003 IFM through Extension of Rotation Age, V1.3

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.4
    Weak

  • Protocol 8

    U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1

    Program:
    Climate Action Reserve
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.3
    Weak

  • Protocol 9

    IFM on Non-Federal U.S. Forestlands, V2.0**

    Program:
    American Carbon Registry
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.3
    Weak

  • Protocol 10

    IFM on Small Non-Industrial Private Forestlands, V1.0**

    Program:
    American Carbon Registry
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.2
    Weak

  • Protocol 11

    U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015

    Program:
    California
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.2
    Weak

  • Protocol 12

    IFM on Canadian Forestlands, V1.0

    Program:
    American Carbon Registry
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.2
    Weak

  • Protocol 13

    Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2.0

    Program:
    British Columbia
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    2.1
    Weak

  • Protocol 14

    Mexico Forest Protocol, V3.0

    Program:
    Climate Action Reserve
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    1.9
    Very Weak

  • Protocol 15

    PM 001 Agriculture and Forestry Carbon Benefit Assessment Methodology, V1.0

    Program:
    Plan Vivo
    Project Type:
    IFM
    Overall Score:
    1.4
    Very Weak

  • Protocol 16

    U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1

    Program:
    Climate Action Reserve
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.7
    Weak

  • Protocol 17

    Afforestation and Reforestation of Degraded Lands

    Program:
    American Carbon Registry
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.7
    Weak

  • Protocol 18

    U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015

    Program:
    California
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.7
    Weak

  • Protocol 19

    VM0047 Afforestation, Reforestation, and Revegetation, V1.0

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.7
    Weak

  • Protocol 20

    Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2

    Program:
    British Columbia
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.4
    Weak

  • Protocol 21

    VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.3
    Weak

  • Protocol 22

    Mexico Forest Protocol, V3.0

    Program:
    Climate Action Reserve
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.3
    Weak

  • Protocol 23

    Afforestation/Reforestation (A/R) GHGs Emissions Reduction & Sequestration, V2.0**

    Program:
    Gold Standard
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.1
    Weak

  • Protocol 24

    Carbon Sequestration Through AR on Private Lands – September 2023

    Program:
    Quebec
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    2.0
    Weak

  • Protocol 25

    PM 001 Agriculture and Forestry Carbon Benefit Assessment Methodology, V1.0

    Program:
    Plan Vivo
    Project Type:
    AR
    Overall Score:
    1.8
    Very Weak

  • Protocol 26

    Active Conservation and Sustainable Management on U.S. Forestlands, V1.0

    Program:
    American Carbon Registry
    Project Type:
    AC
    Overall Score:
    2.2
    Weak

  • Protocol 27

    Forest Carbon Offset Protocol, V2.0

    Program:
    British Columbia
    Project Type:
    AC
    Overall Score:
    2.2
    Weak

  • Protocol 28

    VM0034 Canadian Forest Carbon Offset Methodology, V2.0

    Program:
    Verra
    Project Type:
    AC
    Overall Score:
    2.2
    Weak

  • Protocol 29

    U.S. Forest Protocol, V5.1

    Program:
    Climate Action Reserve
    Project Type:
    AC
    Overall Score:
    2.1
    Weak

  • Protocol 30

    U.S. Forest Projects – June 25, 2015

    Program:
    California
    Project Type:
    AC
    Overall Score:
    2.0
    Weak
/